/clear-speak — Plain-language rewriting
Point it at any writing — a doc, a command file, an issue draft, a commit message, a README paragraph — and it replaces the jargon with words a non-engineer can follow on the first read.
/clear-speak is also stride's canonical standard for what counts as jargon. /linear:plan-work links to it for issue titles, and /linear:finish links to it when explaining a Vision trace in plain English. As a rule it keeps new output plain; as a tool it fixes text that has already drifted.
The test
Can someone understand this without a dictionary or a degree?
If not, find simpler words. The stricter version: if a 16-year-old wouldn't understand it, rewrite it.
How it works
- Spot the jargon — Latin and Greek roots,
-tion/-ment/-ismnouns, abstract compounds, bare code identifiers dropped into prose, and any word you'd never say out loud - Ask the replacement question — "how would I explain this to a smart friend who doesn't know this field?" The answer is usually the rewrite
- Apply the transformation — swap the fancy word for the plain one, and turn actions hiding inside nouns back into verbs
Quick transformations
| Jargon | Clear speak |
|---|---|
migrate_from_legacy() | The step that upgrades your old settings file |
| Dead code | Code nothing uses anymore |
| Parse-before-delete guard | Check the file before deleting it |
| Idempotent install | Safe to run twice |
| Deterministic ordering | Always comes out in the same order |
| Silent no-op | Quietly does nothing |
| Completeness audit | Gap check |
| Architectural analysis | Map the shape |
| Facilitate | Help with |
When to use
- Cleaning up a doc, command file, or reference before it ships
- Naming a function, concept, or heading so it reads plainly
- Sharpening an issue title or description into a plain outcome
- Rewriting a commit body so a non-engineer can follow what changed
- Any time writing slips into fancy words
What it doesn't do
Keep the precise term, add the plain gloss — never strip the precise word.
A technical term earns its place when it is genuinely precise, when the audience expects it, or when simplifying would lose meaning. For a load-bearing term like atomic commit, give it a one-line plain explanation the first time, then use it freely. Clear speak is not dumbing down — it is thinking the idea through until you can say it simply.
Quality check
After a rewrite, four checks:
- The 16-year-old test — would a smart 16-year-old understand this?
- The conversation test — would you say this out loud to a friend?
- The speed test — can readers understand it on the first read?
- The meaning test — did you preserve what it actually said?
Source
Built on George Orwell's six rules for writing, plus two supporting references shipped with the skill: writing clearly, simply, and with action; and plain headings with precise vocabulary inside.